With all the demands, opinions, viewpoints, politics, religion and morality that are being circulated these days around the crucial relationship called Marriage, I ran across this quote from the famed Christian Essayist C.S. Lewis, one of my favorite. It is good to go to some reasonable, well thought out source such as Lewis and G.K. Chesterton, both of which have a great deal to say about Christian marriage, divorce, and the family.
Lewis writes with reason about the fundamental view that Marriage must have its roots in God himself, who since creation depended it to be a particular way. As Lewis says:
Lewis writes with reason about the fundamental view that Marriage must have its roots in God himself, who since creation depended it to be a particular way. As Lewis says:
The Christian idea of
marriage is based on Christ’s words that a man and wife are to be regarded as a
single organism—for that is what the words “one flesh” would be in modern
English. And the Christians believe that when He said this He was not expressing
a sentiment but stating a fact . . .
The full text is below from Lewis' work: Mere Christianity -
“The
Christian idea of marriage is based on Christ’s words that a man and wife are
to be regarded as a single organism—for that is what the words “one flesh”
would be in modern English. And the Christians believe that when He said this
He was not expressing a sentiment but stating a fact—just as one is stating a
fact when one says that a lock and its key are one mechanism, or that a violin
and a bow are one musical instrument. The inventor of the human machine was
telling us that its two halves, the male and the female, were made to be
combined together in pairs, not simply on the sexual level, but totally
combined.…
“What
we call “being in love” is a glorious state, and, in several ways, good for us
… It is a noble feeling, but it is still a feeling. Now no feeling can be
relied on to last in its full intensity, or even to last at all. Knowledge can
last; principles can last; habits can last, but feelings come and go. And in
fact, whatever people say, the state called “being in love” usually does not
last.
“If
the old fairy-tale ending ‘They lived happily ever after’ is taken to mean ‘They
felt for the next fifty years exactly as they felt the day before they were
married,’ then it says what probably never was nor ever could be true, and
would be highly undesirable if it were. Who could bear to live in that
excitement for even five years? What would become of your work, your appetite,
your sleep, your friendships? But, of course, ceasing to be “in love” need not
mean ceasing to love.
“Love
in this second sense—love as distinct from ‘being in love’ is not merely a
feeling. It is a deep unity, maintained by the will and deliberately
strengthened by habit, reinforced by (in Christian marriages) the grace which
both parties ask, and receive, from God. They can have this love for each other
even at those moments when they do not like each other, as you love yourself
even when you do not like yourself.
“They
can retain this love even when each would easily, if they allowed themselves,
be ‘in love’ with someone else. ‘Being in love’ first moved them to promise
fidelity: this quieter love enables them to keep the promise. It is on this
love that the engine of marriage is run: being in love was the explosion that
started it.”
Lewis,
Mere Christianity, (New York: The
Macmillan Company, 1958)
No comments:
Post a Comment